(Hour 1c) Last week’s Adopt-a-thon was a HUGE success at the Manchester Animal Shelter and Shelley Greenglass shared the results. Many of the pets described on our adorable radio show found a home, so Shelley gave us some new pets waiting for a home. Jeff from Manchester called in to rattle our humble host’s cage and to give kudos to Shelley and the shelter. Also, details on their involvement in this weekend’s holiday festivities!
8 Comments
Leave a reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.
Friends of the Manchester Animal Shelter — a sterling example of how to run a quasi-public non-profit corporation and the very antithesis of Phil Greazzo & Tammy Simmons’ Manchester Dog Park Association. In August 2012, Simmons told the Union Leader’s Mark Hayward that the MDPA was going to file for tax-exempt status immediately. Last night, she says “Who needs IRS regulation?” and Greazzo asks why do you even need 501(c)(3) status. SO YOU CAN RAISE MONEY, that’s why. This is from the Friends of the Manchester Animal Shelter site: “Please know that as a 501(c)3 non-profit organization, donations made to the shelter are fully tax deductible as allowed by law.” It is a 501(c)(3) non-profit and is a success. THE MDPA is not and it is a failure, in deficit, with a membership of perhaps 20 paying members (down from the 300 Simmons claimed in 2011), with the insurance being paid out of Greazzo’s own pocket, he claimed at the meeting. Sad. Very sad.
I say, we should put this fellow in charge of the entire city. He has proven himself more than capable as an expert on the Kardashians. Is there nothing that he cannot do? To your success, sir !
Speaking of “dogs”, let’s have a look at the 2001 Manchester mayoral election results: Robert A. Baines (Democrat) 57.3% vs. Richard H. Girard (Republican) 42.7%. Seems like Joe Sullivan’s former boss scarfed up Li’l Richie like a canine eats a rawhide bone and passed him like one of those hot messes at Peanut Park that Tammy Simmons delegates Dan Garthwaite to pick up.
My dear Sherlock, certainly you can do better than to recite 12 year old election results in a pitiful attempt to give someone the needle when there are so many of your fellow “Enemies of the Manchester Dog Park” who luxuriate in far more interesting habits.
Is Li’l Richie’s ongoing hissy fit over any criticism of Phil Greazzo rooted in that love that dare not speak its name, but what we’ll call “bromance”? We know Tammany Hall Simmons herself called her association with the Alderman-Unelect from the West Side “the four happiest years of my life”, but does this “bromance” explain Li’l Richie’s tantrums? Is this the real reason for his continuing display of behavior that would lead observers to apply another “b” word to him, a word that polite people do not use outside of a kennel? Inform yourself on the science behind gay-baiting bigotry: “Homophobia and Homosexuality Linked in New Study; New study says link between homophobia among straight individuals may have to do with hidden homosexual tendencies” http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/04/120406234458.htm
Can’t you see Li’l Richie in his college Psych 101 class continually asking his professor, “What is this concept, ‘Projection’?” Maybe the answer he received explains his hatred for teachers. Or is that rooted in the Oedipal complex? The bizarre homoerotic postings (likely the work of Li’l Richie himself, who has the soul of a factotum but the talent of a stenographer — all the postings from various “individuals” sound remarkably alike) have been a revelation. Quite amazing that a self-described “Christian” would enable this on a platform supported by a Christian radio station, unless he was, of course, the author of these bizarre homoerotic rants.
An admirable attempt, dear Sherlock. Unfortunately, you are wrong on all counts. You and your cohorts have been defeated on the dog park issue and no amount of politically correct whinging will change that fact one iota. I do believe the Kardashians deserve another scintillating article. Why not get started now? We are all breathless with anticipation!
My goodness, I do believe I have touched upon a nerve ! It is not I who chose to associate with persons who possess some rather troubling character flaws. It is not I who falsely claimed in the online comments section of the local newspaper that funds were misappropriated from the dog park for a contribution to a political fund raiser. It is not I who continued to promulgate allegations of corruption in an attempt to sully the reputation of a good public servant in this most recent election. I am delighted that you believe you have deduced my true identity. Sadly, this is but one more demonstration of your lack of insight. The difference between us is that I have told the truth about these matters. You know perfectly well that there has been no fiscal impropriety in the dog park, whatsoever. You know perfectly well that the dog park has always been fully insured to protect the interests of the City. You know perfectly well that the dog park coffers have never contained the amounts of money you alleged to have been misused. You cannot misuse funds that do not exist, my dear fellow. Knowing all those allegations to be untrue, you still insisted on stating them simply for partisan political gain without regard for the person you were damaging. This action does not paint a very flattering picture. Victory eludes you yet again.